Psychedelia.dk

Velkommen til psychedelia.dk. Vi er Danmarks største community for fornuftig anvendelse af rusmidler og legalisering.
Dato og tid er 10 jul 2020 21:51


Alle tider er UTC + 1 time [DST ]




Skriv nyt emne Svar på emne  [ 33 indlæg ]  Gå til side 1, 2  Næste
Forfatter besked
Indlæg: 03 jul 2019 14:13 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem

Tilmeldt: 05 okt 2016 10:24
Indlæg: 510
Det store sølvpapirshats-spørgsmål er om Psychedelia har været udsat for infiltrering og deintegrering af en eller flere personer med det for øje at skabe splid eller det bare er lidt dødvande med admins som enten ikke har teknisk snilde eller magter at gøre noget ved situationen.

Jeg vælger selvfølgelig ikke at tage nogen position men vil derimod give lidt information som redegører for hvilke teknikker som gøres brug af ved bevidst sabotering af online fora eller decideret disinformation.


1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

______________________________________________________________________________________

COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at (ABOVETOPSECRET DOT COM) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

CONCLUSION

Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
______________________________________________________________________________________

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
______________________________________________________________________________________

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist


1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.

Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo.

With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.

c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 03 jul 2019 20:04 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 17 sep 2006 21:46
Indlæg: 2511
7)

8)

9)

tbh tror jeg ikke psy har været udsat for noget sabotage. sitet har i lang tid været døende. overvejer også selv at droppe sitet grundet <reasons>.

_________________
Når du har lortesmag i munden, så tag en cola til bunden

Hvis du ikke er i stemning til at tage stoffer, så kommer du formentlig heller ikke i stemning af at tage dem.
<@jimfear> jeg kom engang mens jeg dødløftede


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 04 jul 2019 11:48 
Offline
Junior medlem

Tilmeldt: 25 apr 2016 14:07
Indlæg: 34
ja den nuværende situtation med et udløbet certifikat ligner ikke sabotage, bare ligegyldighed eller manglende teknisk snilde. Effekten er dog nok at de fleste bliver skræmt væk af de advarsler der kommer når man prøver på at tilgå sitet.

Der er behov for at en med administrator rettigheder til sitet enten får fornyet certifikatet eller slår kryptering (SSL) fra så sitet bare kører http is stedet for https. lets encrypt certifikater udgives af den amerikanske forening EFF (Electronic Freedom foundation), bruges til at krypter forbindelsen og at verificere at man har fat i det rigtige site og er gratis. Det bedste vil selvfølgelig være at få certifikatet fornyet, men de har kun en tre måneders varighed så skal de fornys igen så realistisk set skal man nok enten få automatiseret fornyelsen af certifikaterne (jeg hjælper gerne med dette) eller simpelthen lade være med at bruge dem.

Det mest bekymrende er nok at ingen gør nogen af delene og at 90% af brugerne i mellemtiden ikke kan eller tør gå ind på sitet. Det er trist da sitet leverer en vigtig service og der ikke rigtig er nogen alternativer.


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 04 jul 2019 21:22 
Offline
Medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 23 aug 2008 23:18
Indlæg: 246
SuperGreen skrev:
ja den nuværende situtation med et udløbet certifikat ligner ikke sabotage, bare ligegyldighed eller manglende teknisk snilde.


Ja eller at der er sket noget alvorligt med manden.

SuperGreen skrev:
Det er trist da sitet leverer en vigtig service og der ikke rigtig er nogen alternativer.


Truth!

Personligt så jeg helst vi bibeholdt SSL/TLS. Det er gratis, meget mere sikkert og får psychedelia.dk til at virke mere legitimt.

Nu ved jeg ikke om det kun er en enkelt person der har admin rettighederne, men hvis det er tilfældet ville det være en god idé at sørge for (hvis muligt) at minimum 2-3 personer har rettighederne på ethvert givent tidspunkt så man undgår at drift problemer varer i så lang tid. Hvis rettighederne ligger hos en enkelt person kan vi vel også risikere problemer hvis kontakten af den ene eller anden årsag går helt tabt (lidt som nu..)?

Jeg ville egentligt gerne hjælpe mht drift af sitet, men har simpelthen så meget lort om ørene for tiden så det ansvar tror jeg ikke at jeg tør tage på mig lige nu.


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 04 jul 2019 22:51 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 12 jun 2010 23:00
Indlæg: 1034
Geografisk sted: Køleskabet
Er der virkelig ikke nogle aktive på boardet, som kender Optimus Crime personligt, så vi kan få vendt den synkende skude?

Make Psychedelia Great Again


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 05 jul 2019 04:21 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 17 sep 2006 21:46
Indlæg: 2511
haar skrevet

_________________
Når du har lortesmag i munden, så tag en cola til bunden

Hvis du ikke er i stemning til at tage stoffer, så kommer du formentlig heller ikke i stemning af at tage dem.
<@jimfear> jeg kom engang mens jeg dødløftede


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 06 jul 2019 18:49 
Online
Insane psychedelia user!

Tilmeldt: 18 mar 2014 21:14
Indlæg: 1884
En rigtig behagelig person ville ha svaret :roll:


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 06 jul 2019 19:05 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 17 sep 2006 21:46
Indlæg: 2511
What?

Måske indså han bare at forummet var dødt før os andre.

hehehehe

_________________
Når du har lortesmag i munden, så tag en cola til bunden

Hvis du ikke er i stemning til at tage stoffer, så kommer du formentlig heller ikke i stemning af at tage dem.
<@jimfear> jeg kom engang mens jeg dødløftede


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 06 jul 2019 19:24 
Online
Insane psychedelia user!

Tilmeldt: 18 mar 2014 21:14
Indlæg: 1884
Tja men er skuda lidt nedderen og aflive det på den måde istedet for at give faklen videre når nu der lyder til at være nogen som ønsker det skal leve videre.
Men fair nok du forsvare din ()
Edit retter lige den med hommie for sådan en ville ha svaret.
Ej jeg ved self ikke hvad der fylder i hans liv, men af respekt for al den viden der er lagret herinde burde han få faklen givet videre fx til Bubber istedet for blot at lade stå til.


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 07 jul 2019 00:04 
Offline
Coca-entusiast
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 22 dec 2015 00:35
Indlæg: 495
Geografisk sted: In your dreams, Pedro... In your dreams!
Spaffeh, hvis du kender ham i virkeligheden, så ring til ham eller tag hjem til ham og bank på. Det med at skrive en besked det virker ikke. Og vi kommer ikke videre før en person der rent faktisk kender ham, får fingeren ud, og stepper sit game op.

Du har muligheden for at agere redningsmand, det er nu du skal vise hvilket stof du er gjort af gamle jas! :)

_________________
#DERUDAF!

-Oprensning af gade kokain til 99% Kokain HCl: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=51476
-Acetonevask af kokain: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=51577
-Laboratore analyse og test af renhed af Kokain: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=53060
-LeJunk's Cocaine Purification Technique / Acetone Wash: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=52745
-BOG: The Coca Homegrowers Guide: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=51497


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 07 jul 2019 21:49 
Offline
Admin
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 25 maj 2005 23:45
Indlæg: 2429
Geografisk sted: Inside the animal
Så vidt jeg har forstået er faklen givet videre fra Optimus, og den/de nuværende webmaster(s) har ikke den tilstrækkelige tekniske knowhow til at opretholde siden 100%.
Jeg ved at mindst én bruger er kontaktet for at høre om vedkommende var interesseret i at være webmaster. Det virker ikke som om det var tilfældet.

_________________
- Spis ild
Støt Psychedelia
Psychedelia.dk på facebook


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 07 jul 2019 22:45 
Offline
Coca-entusiast
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 22 dec 2015 00:35
Indlæg: 495
Geografisk sted: In your dreams, Pedro... In your dreams!
Ved man hvem der har overtaget tjansen?

_________________
#DERUDAF!

-Oprensning af gade kokain til 99% Kokain HCl: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=51476
-Acetonevask af kokain: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=51577
-Laboratore analyse og test af renhed af Kokain: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=53060
-LeJunk's Cocaine Purification Technique / Acetone Wash: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=52745
-BOG: The Coca Homegrowers Guide: www.psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=51497


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 07 jul 2019 23:37 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem

Tilmeldt: 16 okt 2011 00:36
Indlæg: 1363
^under tilmeldte brugere og så et klik på rang er optimus og imp de eneste 2 med webmaster titel, but idunno

_________________
legaliser frihed! °ºª -og løs problemerne istedet!


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 08 jul 2019 15:25 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 17 sep 2006 21:46
Indlæg: 2511
har skrevet til Imp så.

- det burde være igang med at blive løst.

inb4 JAMEN DET ER STADIG IKKE LØST..

der går lige lidt tid grundet sommerferie og alle de ting der sker i folks liv :- )

_________________
Når du har lortesmag i munden, så tag en cola til bunden

Hvis du ikke er i stemning til at tage stoffer, så kommer du formentlig heller ikke i stemning af at tage dem.
<@jimfear> jeg kom engang mens jeg dødløftede


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 16:51 
Offline
Site Webmaster

Tilmeldt: 03 jul 2019 20:22
Indlæg: 18
SSL certifikatet skulle meget gerne blive fornyet i løbet af i dag, og derefter går jeg i gang med at få fikset mail-serveren, og hvad der ellers er af ting der ikke kører pt (og der er efterhånden en del)..

Hav tålmodighed lidt endnu, - det hele ordner sig inden længe! :-)


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 19:45 
Offline
Psychedelia Sponsor
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 07 okt 2008 09:49
Indlæg: 1341
Geografisk sted: Wonderland
Fedt nok! Dejligt at der sker noget igen.
Og velkommen til?

_________________
Jo mere man ved; jo mere ved man, man ikke ved..

йети skrev:
Umiddelbart vil jeg tro at det generelt ikke er særligt udbredt at brænde sin kokain af. Hvorfor gør du det?


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 21:00 
Online
Insane psychedelia user!

Tilmeldt: 18 mar 2014 21:14
Indlæg: 1884
Ja optur <3 velkommen til :)


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 21:27 
Offline
Site Webmaster

Tilmeldt: 03 jul 2019 20:22
Indlæg: 18
Jotak!
Har været her siden 2005, men af diverse ligegyldige årsager har jeg oprettet en frisk profil til min nye rolle som teknisk styrmand! :)


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 23:38 
Offline
Moderator
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 29 mar 2006 02:27
Indlæg: 4892
Mange tak Benji!


Top
 Profil  
 
Indlæg: 09 jul 2019 23:49 
Offline
Site Webmaster

Tilmeldt: 03 jul 2019 20:22
Indlæg: 18
Bismann skrev:
Mange tak Benji!

Kan du (og/eller andre) bekræfte at SSL kører igen?


Top
 Profil  
 
Vis indlæg fra foregående:  Sorter efter  
Skriv nyt emne Svar på emne  [ 33 indlæg ]  Gå til side 1, 2  Næste

Alle tider er UTC + 1 time [DST ]


Hvem er online

Brugere der læser dette forum: Ingen og 1 gæst


Du kan ikke skrive nye emner
Du kan ikke besvare emner
Du kan ikke redigere dine indlæg
Du kan ikke slette dine indlæg

Søg efter:
Hop til:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Danish translation & support by Olympus DK Team