Nej, den flyer er fuld a lort. Undskyld sproget, men jeg hader sådan noget. Hvor har du den folder fra? Jeg vil godt slå tænderne ud på vedkomne som har skrevet dét der.

For at svare på dit spørgsmål, så læs den artikel her: http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/c ... lth2.shtml
Du vil få en meget bedre forståelse hvorfor tobak faktisk er farligt (det er ikke tjæren!), og hvorfor cannabis ikke er det. Hvis du er for doven til at læse det, (læs det for faen!) så er der er uddrag bare for at bakke mig selv op:

Many people think smoking marijuana is just as harmful as smoking tobacco, but this is not true. Those who hold that marijuana is equivalent to tobacco are misinformed. Due to the efforts of various federal agencies to discourage use of marijuana in the 1970's the government, in a fit of "reefer madness," conducted several biased studies designed to return results that would equate marijuana smoking with tobacco smoking,or worse.
For example the Berkeley carcinogenic tar studies of the late 1970's concluded that "marijuana is one-and-a-half times as carcinogenic as tobacco." This finding was based solely on thetar content of cannabis leaves compared to that of tobacco, and did not take radioactivity into consideration. (Cannabis tars donot contain radioactive materials.) In addition, it was not considered that:

1) Most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco.

2) Marijuana smokers do not smoke anywhere near as much as tobacco smokers, due to the psychoactive effects of cannabis.

3) Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully linked to marijuana use.

4) Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing ofthe small air passageways in the lungs.

In fact, marijuana has been shown to be an expectorant and actually dilates the air channels it comes in contact with. This is why many asthma sufferers look to marijuana to provide relief. Doctors have postulated that marijuana may, in this respect, be more effective than all of the prescription drugs on the market.
Studies even show that due to marijuana's ability to clear the lungs of smog, pollutants, and cigarette smoke, it may actually reduce your risk of emphysema, bronchitis, and lung cancer. Smokers of cannabis have been shown to outlive non- smokers in some areas by up to two years. Medium to heavy tobacco smokers will live seven to ten years longer if they alsosmoke marijuana.
Cannabis is also radically different from tobacco in that itdoes not contain nicotine and is not addictive. The psychoactiveingredient in marijuana, THC, has been accused of causing brain and genetic damage, but these studies have all been disproven. In fact, the DEA's own Administrative Law Judge Francis Young hasdeclared that "marijuana in its natural form is far safer than many foods we commonly consume."

Der er kræftfremkaldende stoffer i havregryn. Solens stråler er kræftfremkaldende. Det er kræftfremkaldende at indånde luft i byområder.

Jeg forbyder dig at spise havregryn, at være udenfor i dagtimerne og at færdes i byer. Det er for dit eget bedste.

Jo, men de informationer der udbydes er ikke korrekte, og de rigtige informationer er ikke til at få fat i for dem der ikke søger, hvis du forstår hvad jeg mener.

Tror godt jeg ved hvad du mener. Har dog ikke så meget tilovers for dem der ikke søger. Hvis folk vælger at lade deres eneste informationskilde være deres regering, så, jaeh... Meh. Det er virkeligt ikke svært at bruge google. Informationer er tilgængelige for dem der vil have dem. At leve i uvidenhed, er vel et valg som folk bør have ret til at tage. Eller noget. At ryge ting er kræftfremkaldende og usundt. Det ved alle med bare EN funktionel hjernehalvdel. Mange ting er usunde og kræftfremkaldende. Du kan få kræft i tarmene ved at æde kød, du kan få dødelige infektioner af at spise grøntsager, du kan blablabla fucking bla. Der er masser af informationer der ude, som folk kan tage til sig hvis de lyster. Det kan vel ikke være samfundets opgave at oplyse alle borgere om alle nye farer som videnskaben finder frem til. Nærmere, burde det være op til den enkelte borger at opsøge informationer om farer der er relevante for netop den borgers livsstil og værdier. Det er fks. mig uvedkommende, at der findes farlige stoffer i hårfarver og neglelak, hvorimod jeg er dybt interesseret i hvilke fødevarer der viser sig at være pro- og anti-inflammatoriske, fordi det er noget der ren faktisk betyder noget for min situation. Der er VIRKELIGT MANGE ting der viser sig at være farlige, og hvis regeringen og TV etc skulle oplyse os om dem alle, ville der ikke være tid til andet.