Psychedelia.dk

I do believe that something like this might be happening, but I'm having strong doubts about Cheney, Bush, Bush Jr. and Clinton being involved. This move would have been highly unproffesional, and would have endangered the whole project. Further more, why are you selling the evidence, when you could've released them on the internet? In this way you could've stopped the experiments, as millions of people could see that something terribly wrong is happening. Instead you are selling them, so you can get money. I'd say that releasing the evidence would do more harm to the projects.

I beleive it's all a lie, and you are doing this for the money, solely. I'm terribly sorry for these accusations if they are wrong, but you must agree to me, that it's highly unlikely that a U.S. president would risk his image solely to satisfy his sadistic demands. If he had done that, he would probably have gotten his victims killed to ensure that noone would ever tell on him. I would, if I had been in that situation. A president has neither any need to involve himself in the project, I do believe that presidents are very badly suited for doing psychowar against their own population.

Please prove me wrong. No answer will result in me spreading my beleifs.

Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxx

Greetings,
Thank you for your comments here.

It is impossible for us to alleviate your doubts when you have not read our labor-of-love for humanity.

The details you seek are contained within TRANCE Formation of America...hence the reason our lawyers advised us to release it publicly in 1995. This release was due to the documented fact that after our legal court case was stopped in open court...from ALL further adjudication, when Tennessee State Judge Andrew Shookoff declared "laws do not apply in this case for reasons of national security".

We then , on advice of our attorney and a retired US federal judge, presented our written testimony to the US Congressional House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee for Intelligence Oversight and requested a formal hearing. The committee accepted and scheduled us to appear...then it was postponed and rescheduled 2 more times... and to this day is "pending".

Please bear in mind if any US citizen gives proven false testimony about a US president that person can and most likely be charged with a crime, convicted (easily) & subsequently incarcerated for up to 20 years in prison. Ask yourself the question "why" this has not happened.

Also, we have done over 2500 radio and TV talk show appearances, plus the fact that our book is now in 7 languages and sold in some 29 countries...and not ONE person identified (in our book) as perpetrator has threatened a law suit for libel or anything for that matter. Ask yourself why this has happened and perhaps you will want to look a bit deeper into what we have presented.

Also, there are extremely legal penalties for giving false testimony to the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") .. and we FIRST reported all of what is in our book to US Customs who investigated elements and proved we were telling the truth... and then the FBI was notified. We testified to 4 different FBI offices. So ask yourself why we were not stopped or locked up...if even ONE part of our complaint could be proven false.
To date NOT ONE STATEMENT made in our book TRANCE Formation of America has been proven false...not one.

Additionally, you may want to read the tenants of the 1947 US National Security Act as any country that has a peace treaty with the US...every one of it's citizens are subject to the same rule of law as we are.

Thanks for asking the question and we hope you will research the facts.

Respectfully,
Mark & Cathy

P. S. (1) How "unprofessional" is it for a sitting US president (Clinton) to get oral sex performed by a 20 year old intern in the White House and then lie about it on international TV ?
(2) How unprofessional is it for a sitting US president (Nixon) to hire burglars to break in offices and steal files?
Surely you are not so naïve as to believe that because a person is an elected leader that they are above reproach...that would be very "unprofessional" for anyone to accept.