Psychedelia.dk

Velkommen til psychedelia.dk. Vi er Danmarks største community for fornuftig anvendelse af rusmidler og legalisering.
Dato og tid er 28 jul 2025 08:01

Alle tider er UTC + 1 time [DST ]




Skriv nyt emne Svar på emne  [ 38 indlæg ]  Gå til side Foregående  1, 2
Forfatter besked
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 17:25 
Offline
Medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 21 okt 2007 18:44
Indlæg: 217
Geografisk sted: lidt nord for regnbuen og så bare forbi møllen (der hvor det altid sner)
Jeg underskylder min hårde respons :oops: ... Var bare 100% sikker på det efter mine egne erfaringer of hvad jeg havde hørt :) . Det skal dog siges at hvis i har været til festivaller kan i altid finde en eller anden gammel hippi som sider med alle mulige forskellige slags glas og kan mixe dig noget syre. Har jeg ihvertfald da selv set 3 gange :)


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 17:32 
Offline
Medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 21 okt 2007 18:44
Indlæg: 217
Geografisk sted: lidt nord for regnbuen og så bare forbi møllen (der hvor det altid sner)
Faldt lige over den her :) Syntes bare det er meget sjovt at se nogle af alle de forskellige der er.
http://blotterbarn.com/personal.html


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 17:40 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 25 feb 2004 09:57
Indlæg: 1743
Geografisk sted: Orbit Earth
Darkpsyc0 skrev:
Det skal dog siges at hvis i har været til festivaller kan i altid finde en eller anden gammel hippi som sider med alle mulige forskellige slags glas og kan mixe dig noget syre. Har jeg ihvertfald da selv set 3 gange :)
LMAO say what?

_________________
Let Go And Let God!


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 18:15 
Offline
Moderator
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 27 aug 2002 01:01
Indlæg: 2651
Geografisk sted: I mulmehulen
Darkpsyc0:
Din viden om LSD er åbenbart noget nær nul. Jeg tror, med det du har skrevet, at det eneste du ved, er at LSD eksiterer. Ikke andet.
Du finder nok næppe en hippie med et par glas der bare lige mixer LSD sammen til en festival. Og LSD på frimærker er LSD på frimærker, ikke andet. At det føles forskelligt er ret normalt. Som man siger. Der er ikke to trips der er ens. Du ved, lidt ligesom med snefnuggene.

_________________
:roll:


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 18:29 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 27 dec 2006 16:38
Indlæg: 1440
Geografisk sted: !!!
Darkpsyc0 skrev:
Jeg underskylder min hårde respons :oops: ... Var bare 100% sikker på det efter mine egne erfaringer of hvad jeg havde hørt :) . Det skal dog siges at hvis i har været til festivaller kan i altid finde en eller anden gammel hippi som sider med alle mulige forskellige slags glas og kan mixe dig noget syre. Har jeg ihvertfald da selv set 3 gange :)



du er sikker på det ikke var drinks han lavede?.. alkohol kan også gøre folk ret fuck'd


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 06 dec 2007 19:21 
Offline
Medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 21 okt 2007 18:44
Indlæg: 217
Geografisk sted: lidt nord for regnbuen og så bare forbi møllen (der hvor det altid sner)
hehe hvor er i søde :P ... Jeg har kun været til festivaller i Brasilien skal dog siges, ved ikke om det har noget at sige. Men der kunne man få lavet en helt specielt blanding af en eller anden gammel hippi som sad og hælte nogle forskellige slags dråber på en sukkerknald :) .. Fortæller jo bare hvad jeg personligt har oplevet.


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 07 dec 2007 20:56 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 25 feb 2004 09:57
Indlæg: 1743
Geografisk sted: Orbit Earth
@Resist
Rolig nu, de langhårede freaky samfundstrusler aka hippier kan sgu finde på hvad som helst, så den er sikkert go' nok.

Minimal skrev:
Jeg synes dog ikke, at mærker bør være dyrere, fordi de er stærke. Man skal ikke give 150-200 kr. for frimærker, bare fordi det påstås, at de indeholder 400 mics, hvilket de garanteret heller ikke gør.

Jeg er enig i at man aldrig bør give 150-200kr. for et frimærke, men de stærkere mærker er dyrere i alle led af kæden fra producent til bruger, end de svagere så det er ikke så mærkeligt at der er en forskel. Hvor stor den er afhænger selvfølgelig af hvor mange og hvor grådige led det har været igennem. SWIMs kamel påstår at LSD nogen steder ligges i 3 forskellige styrker, den billigste koster ca. halvdelen af den dyreste, og den middelstærke omkring 2/3.

EDIT: Indlæg slettet . Tal pænt, børn!
4) Personlige angreb er ikke accepteret.

_________________
Let Go And Let God!


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 00:19 
Offline
Medlem

Tilmeldt: 05 jul 2007 20:30
Indlæg: 224
Geografisk sted: ..
Minimal skrev:
Nej, der er forskel på, hvor meget aktivt LSD de indeholder. Jeg synes dog ikke, at mærker bør være dyrere, fordi de er stærke. Man skal ikke give 150-200 kr. for frimærker, bare fordi det påstås, at de indeholder 400 mics, hvilket de garanteret heller ikke gør. Ligesom jeg ikke mener, at man skal give 200 kr. for amfetamin, selvom det så er 98% rent. Stærke stoffer er en god ting, men man skal da ikke betale ekstra for det. Det burde være en selvfølge, at produktet er i orden.


Så et måltid på en af danmarks dyreste restauranter burde kun koste det samme som på McD?


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 14:13 
Offline
In our memories
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 03 apr 2002 01:01
Indlæg: 2784
Geografisk sted: København
ThirdEyeFlood skrev:
Jeg er enig i at man aldrig bør give 150-200kr. for et frimærke, men de stærkere mærker er dyrere i alle led af kæden fra producent til bruger, end de svagere så det er ikke så mærkeligt at der er en forskel. Hvor stor den er afhænger selvfølgelig af hvor mange og hvor grådige led det har været igennem. SWIMs kamel påstår at LSD nogen steder ligges i 3 forskellige styrker, den billigste koster ca. halvdelen af den dyreste, og den middelstærke omkring 2/3.


Det er muligt, at SWIY's kamel har ret i det, selvom SWIM (den er jeg med på at få integreret her) dog ikke har oplevet andre prisklasser, selvom mærker/dråber har været kraftige. Men nogle folk vælger måske at score 50-100 kr. selv per mærke, fordi de ved, at de er så gode, at man sagtens kan tage dobbelt pris for dem fx. Og så er det ikke fair forretning.

Møgsvinn skrev:
Så et måltid på en af danmarks dyreste restauranter burde kun koste det samme som på McD?


Nej, men man skal heller ikke overdrive prisforskellen og lade fx en elendig standardkvalitet rundt omkring sætte dagsordenen, således at de gode varer bliver 3 gange så dyre, som de egentlig burde være.


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 18:14 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 10 aug 2004 11:26
Indlæg: 2208
ThirdEyeFlood, beklager mig sure opstød, havde nok fået det forkerte ben ud af sengen den dag.

Sådan som jeg forstår det dog, har han mødt hippier der med diverse gasarter, rent kemisk syntesere lsd til et festival? :shock:


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 18:21 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 25 feb 2004 09:57
Indlæg: 1743
Geografisk sted: Orbit Earth
Resist skrev:
ThirdEyeFlood, beklager mig sure opstød, havde nok fået det forkerte ben ud af sengen den dag.

Sådan som jeg forstår det dog, har han mødt hippier der med diverse gasarter, rent kemisk syntesere lsd til et festival? :shock:
Noget lignende fik jeg også ud af det :D. Men var vist ikke det han mente da han længere oppe skriver at hippien bare sad og dryppede noget på sukkerknalder, det lyder straks en smule mere sandsynligt, ik?! :)

_________________
Let Go And Let God!


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 19:04 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 18 nov 2006 04:12
Indlæg: 539
Geografisk sted: Nord for Sahara og Syd for Nordpolen
Er 200 kr meget for et mærke som man er blæst på i omkring 7-8 timer?

I forhold til måske 5 piller for samme pris, hvor man end ik når de 7-8 timer.. Der drejer det sig måske om 3 timer..


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 08 dec 2007 20:06 
Offline
In our memories
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 03 apr 2002 01:01
Indlæg: 2784
Geografisk sted: København
LilleElefant skrev:
Er 200 kr meget for et mærke som man er blæst på i omkring 7-8 timer?

I forhold til måske 5 piller for samme pris, hvor man end ik når de 7-8 timer.. Der drejer det sig måske om 3 timer..


Et godt LSD-trip er også 500 kr. værd, og hvis man stiller det op mod coke, er det vel også 1000 kr. værd, men føler du dig ikke lidt tørret i røven, hvis din kammerat, som selv har givet måske 50 kr., tager 200 for det?


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 09 dec 2007 19:05 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 26 aug 2006 13:54
Indlæg: 1816
Geografisk sted: Fælledparken :P
LÆS den her artikel: http://www.bruceeisner.com/writings/2004/09/lsd_purity_from.html

Citat:
In a private correspondence, Dr Alexander T. Shulgin, a professor of toxicology at the University of California at Berkeley commented:

In the usual analysis of LSD (such as done at PharmChem Foundation) one chromatographs an extract of the suspected drug, observes the resulting separation under UV light, and then sprays the plate with some color-generating agent such as paradimethylaminobenzaldehyde (PDAB). If there are impurities present that fluoresce (such as lysergic acid or iso-LSD) and that have mobility in the chromatographic separation, they will be seen. If impurities are present that have the intact indole-2-hydrogen atom, they will give blue to purple colors with PDAB. Both tests require, of course, that there are amounts present sufficient to be seen. But if the impurity does not fluoresce (as is known to occur with lumi-LSD or any of the photoaddition products) or will not react with PDAB (as would be found with 2-substituted impurities such as 2-oxo-ergots), then they (the impurities) would remain invisible. It is completely possible that an LSD sample could be grossly contaminated with impurities and, if they did not give any response to one of these two tests, it is highly likely that their presence would never even be suspected.

Again, it would be helpful if street-drug analysis groups started looking for by-product impurities and established criteria for psychedelic chemical purity. They must stop labeling their impure samples "LSD", a habit that suggests purity and thereby creates much confusing in the public mind and among drug writers. Instead they must clearly distinguish between street acid and pure, pharmaceutical LSD. And if they cannot afford the equipment to test LSD (mass spectrometers and electron microscopes), then they should let the public know about their true capacities. For that matter, none of the commercially sold drug-testing kits is capable of determining purity.

Many early LSD users later gave up on acid and tried other methods of consciousness-expansion as available LSD became impure. They thought that LSD did not work any more, or blamed their heads, not realizing it was a change in the nature of the actual chemical. Thus, the increasing number of impurities led many people to repress the mystical experiences they had had, and retreat to a comfortable, "cool" conformity. Or they turned to Eastern gurus and Jesus movements.

I suspect that impurities give people body trips (euphoria) rather than the pure mind trips of LSD (ecstasy). People turned to other euphoria-producing drugs (pot is on of these) because street acid fell into the realm of dishonest dealing games and lost the spiritual qualities of LSD. Just the fact that LSD did not work any more led people into attempts to escape from the all-too-static reality via coke, pot, tranquilizers, alcohol and smack.

As experiences changed, the emphasis among the makers and distributors of LSD changed. In the beginning, the main motivation was spiritual - to turn people on. Much LSD was given for free, and dealing was just an amateur pastime. As LSD became another in a long list of body drugs, avarice polluted the spiritual stream.

The real responsibility for all this lies not with the underground, or even the public, victims of brainwashing with beer and TV, but with the government. Today, a small elite of government-sanctioned scientists controls LSD in the United States. Despite the good their limited research does, their exclusive and narrow-sighted use of these drugs seems sad in the face of the much greater good that psychedelics could do if more widely used. Many suggestions for more rational use include making LSD a prescription drug, creating LSD centers or making LSD a patent medicine.

The psychedelic movement, which has been in eclipse for ten years, will remain dormant until people can get LSD of known strength and purity. Until then, if you are an acidhead, chances are you've never taken LSD.


Artiklen er udgivet i 1977.. Spørgsmålet fra mig må vel så være, hvor mange af jer mener at det "LSD" i indtager er rent pharmaceutisk LSD.. Og ikke bare "gade-syre" som der ifgl. Eisner, Shulgin og andre er en virkningsmæssig kæmpe forskel på ift. den dengang lovligt producerede rene LSD??


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 09 dec 2007 20:14 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!

Tilmeldt: 18 jul 2000 01:01
Indlæg: 2998
Geografisk sted: On a placid island of ignorance amidst the black seas of infinity
Cubensis skrev:
Artiklen er udgivet i 1977.. Spørgsmålet fra mig må vel så være, hvor mange af jer mener at det "LSD" i indtager er rent pharmaceutisk LSD.. Og ikke bare "gade-syre" som der ifgl. Eisner, Shulgin og andre er en virkningsmæssig kæmpe forskel på ift. den dengang lovligt producerede rene LSD??

En noget subjektiv og spekulativ artikel efter min mening. Verden mangler nogen blindede forsøg hvor folk får enten ren LSD eller en tilsvarende stærk dosis "gade LSD" uden at vide hvornår de får hvad - men det er nok ikke et studie vi skal forvente at se udført i nærmeste fremtid...
Jeg tror ikke at der er nogen herinde som har taget ren, farmaceutisk LSD... Sandoz stoppede produktionen af stoffet i 1966, og det skulle da være Fandens om der var nogen her inde fra som havde haft held til at anskaffe sig sådan en ampul. Jeg tror så heller ikke på at mange herinde fra har prøvet farmaceutisk MDMA, amfetamin, eller lignende.
Læs denne artikel, der er en del data fra analyser af "gade LSD": LSD Analysis
Som Thirdeyeflood også skriver, sælges LSD ofte fra fremstillerens side i forskellige kvaliteter, alt efter hvor oprenset stoffet er. LC/MS-analyser af LSD solgt på gaden viser typisk LSD og en mindre mængde lumi-LSD som eneste tilstedeværende stoffer. Jeg skal lige se om jeg kan finde en nutidig analyse et sted. SVJV er der ikke meget som tyder på at der er andre derivater i bredt omløb.
Ved drugtest for LSD screener man for metabolitten 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD - så hvis det der er på gaden ikke er LSD, er det i hvert fald noget som giver samme metabolit.


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 09 dec 2007 20:21 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 25 feb 2004 09:57
Indlæg: 1743
Geografisk sted: Orbit Earth
LÆS bagefter den her artikel :
Citat:
Myth Debunking & Storage:
LSD Purity
by Earth & Fire Erowid
June 2006
Erowid Extracts #10
Citation: Erowid E, Erowid F. "LSD Purity." Erowid Extracts. Jun 2006;10:22-23.
Whether or not there is any "real" d-LSD available on the underground market is a debate that recurs cyclically. Most informed people in the field dismiss the occasional flare-up of claims that those who have only had street acid after the 1970s have never had "pure acid". This claim is often accompanied by related claims that modern street acid is badly made, contaminated, degraded, or something other than LSD altogether. There are further speculations about whether even minute impurities could affect the receptor binding of LSD and therefore change the experience, or how LSD degrades over time, possibly converting active LSD into lumi-LSD, iso-LSD, or other less-well-known degradation products that might alter the effects of the material.

It is our job to take such debates seriously and to try to add data to them wherever possible. Six years ago, we attempted to start an LSD Testing Project, but the complexity of the actual testing procedure coupled with a fear of the Drug Enforcement Administration by the labs licensed and capable of doing such testing meant that we were only able to get a single sample analyzed. Recently, an event occurred that provides some additional data in this slowly evolving debate.

An unopened, brown-glass vial of 1951 Sandoz LSD-25 (Delysid) was contributed to a gathering in celebration of Albert Hofmann's 100th birthday. The vial had been in the possession of a single person for the last 30+ years, stored casually, mostly in darkness. When opened, the powder was a very light brown-sugar to salmon color. One chemist described the fluffy, clumpy, sparkly crystalline powder as looking like "crushed needles". It was weighed and dissolved into four-ounce liquid doses containing between 100 and 110 micrograms each (± 10%).

Storage & Degradation
Although the vial was completely sealed, without cracks, one of the major questions was whether there would be significant loss of potency by degradation as a result of the 55 years that had passed since it was manufactured. After trying it, the predominant opinion among the more than 70 participants and observers was that there was no detectable loss in potency. This was the clearest result from the reported experiment: air-tight brown glass appears to be a very effective long-term storage method for LSD. After 55 years, stored at varying room temperatures, the LSD seemed to be fully potent.

Is Sandoz LSD Different?
The other major question on many people's minds seemed to be how Sandoz LSD would differ from the street acid they'd taken before. This was something a number of them considered, after the initial surprise over the fact that the material seemed not to have lost potency. We asked several participants to further describe their thoughts, by answering the query:
"Briefly describe your experience with LSD (number of times taken, how long ago first taken) and compare your experience of other sources of acid with the Sandoz material you tried. Was the Sandoz LSD different than street acid? Was it about the same? Share some of your thoughts about this."
Some people appeared hesitant to answer whether they felt that the Sandoz LSD was qualitatively different from other acid they had taken. Several participants were moderately concerned that if they said the LSD seemed similar to other street acid, the observation could potentially sadden other participants or appear ungrateful to the extremely generous provider. There were raves about the unquestioned magic of the event, and the unique opportunity to try such an elusive and mythically sourced substance. However, the consensus among those to whom we spoke who had substantial experience with street acid was that the 55-year-old, apparently fully potent, Sandoz LSD was experientially indistinguishable from other acid they'd tried. Unfortunately, this subjective finding is unlikely to satisfy people who believe that street acid is impure and low quality. There could be two reasons why the effects of the Sandoz LSD were nearly identical to that of street LSD: good quality street acid could be as pure as Sandoz LSD, or the Sandoz LSD could have been impure or degraded. However, participants described feeling, both during and after the experience, that the quality was high and the potency undamaged; they considered the argument "street acid isn't really like pure LSD" to be settled.


Following are short comments from four people who tried the 1951 Sandoz LSD.


I first tried acid about 12 years ago and have taken it a total of around 40 times. I've had blotter, microdots, and liquid LSD. The quality has varied from time to time and batch to batch, with some notable paper seeming to be clearly different than others and some seeming better. I heard about the debate regarding whether street acid was "real d-LSD" before I had ever tried it, but the resources I looked at in the early 1990s seemed to indicate that the material sold on blotter was, in fact, LSD.

I was excited about trying the material from Sandoz. I had no idea what to expect. I took an amount (in liquid) that was measured to be 150-170 µg of LSD, that is, if the crystalline material in the vial was 100% d-LSD. I have never had precisely measured LSD, but I had tried some of the brown microdots that were going around that looked like the ones Erowid wrote about in their LSD Analysis article in 2003, which said they were around 21 µg each. Four to six of those matched up with my previous experiences of a single hit of "strong" blotter.

As I started coming up on the Sandoz material, it felt like some of the better acid I'd tried. The peak several hours felt nearly identical to what I'd expect from taking eight or so of those brown dots or 1.5-2 hits of decent late 1990s blotter. It was good, but it was just like other acid. - Z


I've had the pleasure of taking LSD more than 35 times over the past 15 years. I'm usually pretty careful about the quality of the material, as careful as I can be given that the process is to buy strips of blotter from a friend and go on their word that the quality is good.

Probably two thirds of my acid trips have been with blotter and the other third split between microdots or liquid. Overall, I've been very happy with the quality. I've never gotten inactive acid, and the weakest stuff I've ever had was described that way before I bought it, so I knew what I was getting. I've had material that seemed ultra-clean (whatever that means) and I've had trips where it seemed like I was getting more body tension and anxiety than usual, though nothing particularly bad. But despite the moderate variety in my experiences, and the vague sense that one batch seems a little different than the next, it's certainly possible that it's all just normal variation in effects from pure LSD.

But I've also heard the stories that pure LSD, like Sandoz LSD or "orange sunshine" from the '60s, was somehow so much better than what's available today. So when I got the chance to try the 1951 Sandoz LSD, I was really interested to see what it would be like. I wondered if it would be weak, degraded. Or would it be way stronger than what we all expected, since it was the real deal? I took approximately 100 µg and found it to be exactly what I'd expect from a solid single hit of good quality blotter. In terms of body load, the effects felt comparable to almost all batches of acid I've taken before. I wouldn't be able to tell the difference. It was a great experience, and for me helped answer the question of whether the acid I've had before was good material, and the answer is yes. - R


I first took LSD in 1984 while in high school. Since then, I have dropped acid perhaps sixty times, mainly in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Dealers back then usually claimed the "per hit" dose was 100 µg. Later in life I learned that this probably wasn't the case. However, most of the hits that I got were of similar potency, at least. Only once did I get some shit that was about half as strong as the hits I was used to.

I have taken "micro doses" a few times-perhaps 10-15 µg. Some friends swear by this use as a daily stimulant, increasing the dose slightly each day. I never warmed to this approach. It always created a feeling of not being comfortable in my own skin-tight and anxious, with trouble falling asleep afterwards. Side effects produced by LSD seem more pronounced when I take lower doses, since the main thing that I am getting from it is basically the side effects.

When I reach my "full dose" level-approximately 150 µg or above-my experiences are always within the scope of effects described in the LSD literature: from heavenly bliss voyages, to giggle fits, to psychological introspection, to hellish nightmares. I attribute the variance in effects to set and setting. I have never understood when people bitched about "bad acid", or how certain acid produced more physical side effects than other "cleaner" acid. This has not been the case for me: the range of effects and side effects has been consistent, regardless of the source, and dependent on the dose that I took.

While acid was my drug of choice in my late teens and early twenties, I haven't taken it frequently since then. But of course I jumped at an opportunity to try Sandoz material. Since I saw the powder being weighed, and was privy to the dosing calculations and titration, I feel comfortable that I got reasonably close to 100 µg. I chose to take this lighter dose due to the party environment that I was in, and also so that I could obtain some better sense as to what a "known dose" of 100 µg feels like. I spent an enjoyable evening with friends and acquaintances, sharing a lot of laughter. Visuals were in full effect, but there was nothing transpersonal at this level. At one point, I was absolutely certain of a question that a friend was about to ask me, and then he asked it-a strange bit of telepathy, since the inquiry wasn't related directly to anything we were talking about. So there was some of that "magic" present that makes one want to believe that anything is possible.

Ultimately, consuming Sandoz material solidified my opinion that every time in the past when I took "street acid" the stuff that I was getting truly was LSD. The Sandoz LSD was great-it just wasn't any better. So don't let hippies who wax rhapsodic about the good old days and claim that "LSD is no longer LSD" fool you. "Bad acid" more likely indicates a "bad mindset", a "bad environment", or an incorrect dose, than any effect from some miniscule amount of impurity that might be present. - Fork


I've taken LSD probably around 30-40 times. Most of my experiences have been with blotter, but I've done liquid and microdots as well.

My experiences with LSD over the years have been varied. It can be tricky to differentiate which characteristics of an experience can be attributed to a drug versus set and setting.

With that disclaimer in mind, I must say that I could not tell the difference between the Sandoz LSD and any other form of LSD I've tried. I was certainly paying attention to this issue, as I've heard the claims that acid today isn't as good as it used to be, in the '50s and '60s, but I would have to say, based on my experiences, that acid is acid. - F

http://www.erwid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_article2.shtml

Jeg vil påstå at det reneste 'gade-syre' (needlepoint) er ligeså godt som farmaceutisk LSD. Der findes dog andre former som ikke er nær så godt oprenset som amber f.eks. og som indeholder urenheder, hvor meget disse urenheder har betydning for trippet er jeg lidt mere i tvivl om, da jeg personligt har haft udemærkede trips på amber, der skulle godt nok lidt mere til og bodyloaded var større. At der skulle være kæmpe forskel på LSD fra dengang til nu, eks.v. at det skulle være meget mere spirituelt dengang, giver jeg ikke meget for, det lyder som en klassisk fejtagelse ml. stoffet selv og så set & setting.

_________________
Let Go And Let God!


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 09 dec 2007 20:48 
Offline
Insane psychedelia user!
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 26 aug 2006 13:54
Indlæg: 1816
Geografisk sted: Fælledparken :P
Damn u guys.. I får ret, det var naivt at konkludere ud fra den artikel.
Dog er det bemærkelsesværdigt at der udfra de data i Proms. artikel er den del produkter der indeholder iso-LSD..

Det må vel være end of discussion?


Top
 Profil  
 
 Titel:
Indlæg: 10 dec 2007 01:54 
Offline
Dedikeret medlem
Brugeravatar

Tilmeldt: 22 maj 2007 23:49
Indlæg: 792
yderst interesserant diskussion samt læsning :)

_________________
Once you get locked into a serious drug collection, the tendency is to push it as hard as you can.
Gør dig selv en tjeneste, og lad være med at starte en samling.


Top
 Profil  
 
Vis indlæg fra foregående:  Sorter efter  
Skriv nyt emne Svar på emne  [ 38 indlæg ]  Gå til side Foregående  1, 2

Alle tider er UTC + 1 time [DST ]


Hvem er online

Brugere der læser dette forum: Ingen og 7 gæster


Du kan ikke skrive nye emner
Du kan ikke besvare emner
Du kan ikke redigere dine indlæg
Du kan ikke slette dine indlæg

Søg efter:
Hop til:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Danish translation & support by Olympus DK Team