Tilbage i 1972 nedsattes en kommission, der skulle overvåge og rådgive om cannabisproblemer i USA. Denne kommission stod bag en rapport, der skulle klarlægge rødderne til problemerne, samt pege i hvilken retning, regeringens politik skulle løbe. Konklusionen sad ikke lige i skabet, da problemerne nedtonedes lidt og en legalisering foreslås. Rapporten er ret god og nuanceret, og så er den forholdsvist letlæst. Den er stadig relevant, selvom den ikke er tungt videnskabelig. Og vi kan helt sikkert genkende de moderne tilstande, i hvertfald de politiske, i den. Måske nogle af pointerne kunne omskrives til dansk og cirkuleres, med henvisning til originalrapporten? Jeg synes, der skal lidt mere gods på bordet, når vi diskuterer legalisering. Pace Tuxen, men debatten kræver lidt mere støv og jakkesæt, for det er altså Bente og Bent fra de konservative, der skal ind i kampen, ikke teenagere fra hovedstadsområdet (for de er allerede inde i den,
).
Her er et link til den:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/lib ... ncmenu.htm og et uddrag fra indledningen:
Citat:
Origins of the Marihuana Problem
Marihuana has been used as an intoxicant in various parts of the world for centuries and in this country for 75 years. Yet use of the drug has been regarded as a problem of major proportions for less than a decade. We will not find the reasons for contemporary social concern in pharmacology texts or previous governmental reports, for we are dealing with two separate realities: a drug with certain pharmacologic properties and determinable, although variable, effects on man; and a pattern of human behavior, individual and group, which has, as a behavior, created fear, anger, confusion, and uncertainty among a large segment of the contemporary American public. The marihuana behavior pattern is the source of the marihuana controversy.
The most apparent feature of the behavior is that it is against the law. But inconsistency between behavior and the legal norm is not sufficient, in itself, to create a social problem. Marihuana, has been an illegal substance for several decades; and the widespread violation of laws against gambling and adultery have not excited the public to the same extent as has marihuana-smoking in recent years.
At the same time, we suspect that illegality may play an important role in problem definition where drugs are concerned. Alcohol is of proven danger to individual and societal health and the public is well aware of its dangers, yet use of this drug has not been accorded the same problem status. Marihuana's illegality may have been a necessary condition for the marihuana problem, but the increased violation of the legal proscription does not by itself explain the phenomenon.
The Commission believes that three interrelated factors have fostered the definition of marihuana as a major national problem. First, the illegal behavior is highly visible to all segments of our society. Second, use of the drug is perceived to threaten the health and morality not only of the individual but of the society itself. Third, and most important, the drug has evolved in the late sixties and early seventies, as a symbol of wider social conflicts and public issues.
God læselyst!
Log ind
Tilmeld
OSS
Søg
du skulle tilfældigvis ikke være i besiddelse af en PDF fil af rapporten?